It's more than a little disconcerting that the moderators allow libelous and outright false statements from jb welda about me to be posted, but my rebuttal to try clear up his misunderstanding of the reality was not allowed to be shown?
Why was he allowed to post his opinion based on incorrect assumptions, but I am not allowed to respond?
Again to be clear, I do not know who "Just Mark" is and it is NOT me.
Since this post was allowed and since jb has been editing his post in an attempt to try to talk down to me, or "pile on" as he says, it's only fair that I'll try to offer my original response the same way.
Well JB,
You seem quick to assume (incorrectly) an awful lot there. First off as I mentioned in that post, I did not write that MCM post that I shared, it was sent to me by a friend. Maybe you need to reread it without so much bias yourself? I am not "Just Mark" and I do not know or even have a clue who he is.
Since I did not receive a copy I asked a few friends who had access to the magazine and they told me it was odd that the GSL BOS winning car was absent from the coverage. I don't know why they would say that if what you are saying is true, but I trusted them and that is what I based my comment on.
If I'm so self serving why do you think it is that I did not claim ownership of said model when asking the question?
It was an observation of the coverage of the magazine (again as it was told to me) not an attempt to "self promote" as you incorrectly state. Pardon me, but I read a lot of bitterness in your diatribe.
I'm not sure how "Trumpian" applies in this case or why you would use it here; injecting politics into this discussion seems like an unwise attempt to besmirch those you disagree with. Since I looked up the meaning of the word, should I take it as you think I am the President of Car Modeling? Thank you! But I chose not to run a long time ago...![]()
![]()
I am not cyber stalking anyone and you are way out of line for accusing me of doing so. Apparently, (by your words) you have confused me with someone else (maybe the person who wrote the post on MCM?) and some of your post makes zero sense in the context of this discussion, but it does read as bitter drivel that I won't waste any more of my time trying to decipher.
One last point; there is no innuendo in my posts. I think I made my points clearly. In that vein some of what you wrote comes off rather hypocritical while you are accusing others of what you are doing. You come here only to blast others you disagree with and then hide behind the false claim of "constructive observations". Maybe you should take some of your own advice as it fits what you are doing far more than than what you are falsely accusing me of. You can be an MCM/Gregg supporter all you want, but there are many of us who were burned and had content essentially stolen from them by Gregg and we are equally entitled to our point of view as anyone else. We don't call those supporters out and try to shame them as you are attempting to do here. We have stated facts and not went off on opinionated personal attacks. Don't like the message? It's not the messenger's fault.
You can respond to this, (as I'm sure you're inclined to), but I will not respond to you any further. Your attitude and flaming/trolling in your post makes it clear that you have an issue with me (or someone who you think is me), and as long as you are of the mindset that Gregg is "just a guy trying to put out a magazine" and are willing to dismiss the cheating of contributors by him, we will be at odds and you'll just have to live with it. Have a nice day.
BTW, A Ponzi scheme is a form of fraud that lures investors and pays profits to earlier investors with funds from more recent investors. The scheme leads victims to believe that profits are coming from product sales or other means, and they remain unaware that other investors are the source of funds. And that is exactly what the lifetime subscription did.
Bookmarks